Home / Academics / Division
of Math & Science / Faculty / Christopher
Jones / Dissertation /
Chapter 1-Section 5.5
5.5 Polypyrrole Intercalation
into the Bi-Sr-Ca-Cu-O System
Using the
knowledge base described previously, this new research has been on
hybrid structures composed of alternating layers of conducting polymer
and high-temperature superconductor that could be utilized in the
formation of nanocomposite assemblies that have the ability to have
their electronic properties modified upon room temperature doping
and undoping within the conducting polymer layers. The first step
toward this goal is the controlled intercalative insertion of a conducting
polymer into a layered superconductor such as the Bi2Sr2Can-1CunO2n+4 which
contains a van der Waals gap between adjacent bismuth-oxide layers.
The compound
used in these studies, Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x,
was prepared as described earlier by conventional solid-state reaction
of stoichiometric amounts of Bi2O3, SrCO3,
CaCO3, and CuO. Next, the material was intercalated with
iodine through vapor phase exposure to iodine at 150oC
for 3-10 days. Mass uptake experiments confirm that iodine is inserted
at a ratio of one iodine atom per Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x unit. This
step increases the oxidation state of copper and possibly bismuth. The
reaction also expands the gap between the bismuth-oxide layers by
~3.7 Ć. Pyrrole monomer was purified with activated alumina. The
I-Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x sample
was then vacuum sealed with pyrrole and heated to 100-150oC
for 3-10 days. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) was done with a Philips
x-ray powder diffractometer. Elemental analysis was done by Galbraith
Labs. The sample’s morphology was visualized with a JEOL 35C Scanning
Electron Microscope (SEM).
Direct intercalation of pyrrole into the
Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x phase
proved unsuccessful without prior intercalation of iodine. Iodine
may be used as prop to hold the lattice open so that pyrrole units
can be inserted. In addition, iodine serves to further oxidize
the Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x material. This
oxidation is important because the pyrrole monomer is subsequently
oxidized as it is inserted into the Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x lattice. The
oxidation of pyrrole initiates polymerization of the monomer species.
X-ray powder
diffraction of the (ppy)yI1-2y-Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x system
reveals that the unit cell of Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x has
a spacing along the c-axis of 15.4 Ć (x2) as shown in Figure 5.1(a). Iodine
insertion increases this distance to 18.1 Ć, Figure 5.1(b). After
insertion of polypyrrole, this distance drops to 17.9 Ć, Figure 5.1(c),
giving a total c-axis expansion of ~3.5 Ć between each bismuth oxide
layer. This is consistent with polypyrrole in a planar (i.e., edge
on) arrangement. Illustration 5.3 shows a schematic diagram at each
stage of the polymer insertion. A representation of the possible
crystal structure of polypyrrole intercalated Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x is
shown in Illustration 5.4.
Elemental
analysis reveals carbon and nitrogen are in a 1:4 ratio, consistent
with polypyrrole. Elemental analysis also shows that there is about
0.25 pyrrole units for every Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x as
well as a significant loss of iodine after intercalation.
Based on
the packing models117 derived from electron diffraction data, planar polypyrrole
is expected to have a maximum packing of (ppy)xI1-2y-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8. The
packing117 of polypyrrole is expected to pack in a head-to-tail arrangement
at seen in Illustration 5.5. Although the exact arrangement of polypyrrole
is unclear, it is believed that polypyrrole packs in a planar arrangement
since the distance between the bismuth-oxide layers was increased
by approximately the thickness of planar pyrrole, 3.5 Ć, rather than
pyrrole positioned perpendicular to the bismuth-oxide sheets with
a spacing of ~7 Ć.
Figure
5.1: X-ray powder diffraction of the three stages of intercalation:
a) Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x starting
material, b) iodine intercalated Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x,
and c) Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x intercalated
with polypyrrole.

Illustration
5.3: Schematic diagram of a) Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x,
b) iodine intercalated Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x,
and c) Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x intercalated
with polypyrrole.

Illustration
5.4: Crystal packing motif for polypyrrole intercalated Bi2SrrCaCu2O8±x where
the layers contain a) calcium, b) copper-oxide, c) strontium-oxide,
d) bismuth-oxide, and e) polypyrrole.
|
Sample
|
C
(%)
|
N
(%)
|
H
(%)
|
I-BSCCO
(%)
|
x*
|
|
(A)
|
1.38
|
0.53
|
<0.5
|
96.66
|
0.26
|
|
(B)
|
<0.5
|
<0.5
|
<0.5
|
>98.5
|
0
|
|
(C)
|
16.13
|
0.71
|
5.42
|
77.74
|
4.4
|
* Calculated from carbon values.
Table 5.3: Elemental analysis for C,
N, and H in a) polypyrrole intercalated Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x b)
I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x and c)
polypyrrole extracted from polypyrrole intercalated Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. Here,
the x value refers to the amount of pyrrole units.
Intercalation of polypyrrole
at higher temperatures appeared to increase the amount of polypyrrole
in the ceramic sample. This is likely due to the fact that some polypyrrole
is intercalated on the surface and between the grains. The amount
of iodine also remains high as the sample temperature is increased. This
is another indication that polypyrrole is not being intercalated. If
it were, more iodine would leave the lattice to accommodate for the
intercalated pyrrole species.
Polypyrrole is known to
be a thermally stable material. Thermal gravimetric analysis of the
polypyrrole intercalated Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x shows
no significant weight loss until ~200oC with little mass
loss after 550oC. This behavior is quite similar to that
of polypyrrole. Figure 5.2 shows the thermal gravimetric analysis
of both materials. The similarities in these measurements and the
fact that pyrrole itself has a boiling point of 130oC would
suggest that the intercalated pyrrole has been polymerized.
|
Sample
|
Temp.
|
C
(%)
|
N
(%)
|
H
(%)
|
I
(%)
|
BSCCO
(%)
|
y
|
z*
|
|
(A)
|
100
|
1.38
|
0.53
|
<0.5
|
0.10
|
96.66
|
0.10
|
0.26
|
|
(B)
|
150
|
<0.5
|
<0.5
|
<0.5
|
6.12
|
>98.5
|
0.46
|
0
|
|
(C)
|
---
|
16.13
|
0.71
|
5.42
|
<0.5
|
77.74
|
---
|
4.4
|
|
(D)
|
100
|
1.78
|
0.50
|
<0.5
|
3.21
|
94.51
|
0.24
|
0.35
|
|
(E)
|
100
|
2.11
|
0.82
|
<0.5
|
5.13
|
91.94
|
0.40
|
0.43
|
|
(F)
|
125
|
2.69
|
0.93
|
<0.5
|
5.45
|
90.93
|
0.43
|
0.55
|
|
(G)
|
150
|
2.72
|
1.05
|
<0.5
|
5.22
|
91.01
|
0.41
|
0.56
|
|
(H)
|
175
|
2.69
|
0.94
|
<0.5
|
5.68
|
90.69
|
0.45
|
0.60
|
|
(I)
|
150
|
7.55
|
1.33
|
0.81
|
---
|
>90.31
|
---
|
1.07
|
* Calculated from carbon values.
Table 5.4: Elemental
analysis of intercalated Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. The x value
refers to the amount of pyrrole units and y refers to the
amount of iodine in the formulation (ppy)zBi2Sr2CaCu2O8. Samples
(a,d-h) are of I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x samples
that were intercalated by vapor phase exposure to pyrrole at various
temperatures. The exceptions are: b) I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x with
no exposure to pyrrole c) ppy/I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x dissolved
in HCl, and i) I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x exposed
to 2,5-dimethylpyrrole instead of pyrrole. 
Illustration 5.5: Graphical
illustration of the ordering of three pyrrole oligomers (from electron
diffraction data117) when polypyrrole is in a planar arrangement. The underlying
framework shows location of alternating bismuth and oxygen atoms
within the bismuth-oxide sheet of Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x (from
x-ray diffraction data).
Exposure of (ppy)yI1-2y-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x to
HCl for several hours reveals a resistance to the acid with part of
the starting material not dissolving. Indeed, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x and
I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x dissolve
within minutes. Unlike HNO3, HCl does not oxidize pyrrole
and initiate polymerization of the monomer. Elemental analysis of
the undissolved material reveals that C, N, and H are in the same proportions
as polypyrrole and not pyrrole monomer. These facts point to pyrrole
existing inside the matrix of the superconductor in its polymerized
form.
The volume fraction of polypyrrole
added to Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x is
calculated from elemental analysis data to be ~20%. Scanning electron
microscopy was performed to confirm that the polymerized pyrrole was
not residing between the grains and on the surface on the superconductor. As
shown in Illustration 5.6(a) and 5.6(c), there is little difference
in the appearance of the surface morphology between the polypyrrole
intercalated sample and the untreated sample. In contrast, Illustration
5.6(d) shows a Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x pellet
with polypyrrole grown on the surface of the pellet. The intercalated
sample has no polymer filling between the grains and no change in surface
morphology. Illustration 5.7 shows scanning electron micrographs of
polypyrrole intercalated into the Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+x phase
with similar results.
Conductivity
and magnetic studies reveal an increase in the resistivity and a loss
of superconductivity after polypyrrole intercalation. This is likely
due to the release of protons which is expected during the polymerization
process according to Equation 5.1.

Figure 5.2: Thermal gravimetric
analysis of a) polypyrrole and b) polypyrrole intercalated into Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x.

Illustration
5.6: Scanning electron micrographs of a) Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x b)
IBi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x c)
(ppy)0.25I0.5Bi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x and
d) polypyrrole coated IBi2Sr1.8Ca1.2Cu2O8+x surface.
Illustration
5.7: Scanning electron micrographs of a) Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10 and
b) polypyrrole intercalated Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10.
|
Intercalating
Material
|
Host
|
Temp.
(OC)
|
XRPD
|
Observations
|
|
iodine
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
new pattern
|
more brittle
|
|
pyrrole
|
BSCCO
I-BSCCO
|
150
|
little change
new pattern
|
little change
little change
|
|
2,5 dimethyl-pyrrole
|
I-BSCCO
|
150
|
low intensity
|
---
|
|
aniline
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
minor shift
|
---
|
|
pyridine
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no change
|
---
|
|
thiophene
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no change
|
---
|
|
TCNQ solution
TCNQ solution
TCNQ / iodine
|
BSCCO
I-BSCCO
BSCCO
|
80
80
150
|
no change
no change
no ID*
|
---
---
yellow surface
|
|
TTF / iodine
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no ID*
|
"flattened"
|
|
TMTSF / iodine
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no ID*
|
---
|
|
ET
ET / iodine
|
BSCCO
BSCCO
|
150
150
|
no ID*
no ID*
|
deformed
deformed
|
*XRPD pattern is different
from the starting material, but not yet identified.
Table 5.5: Table showing
a variety of materials examined for possible intercalation.
|
Intercalating
Material
|
Host
|
Temp.
(OC)
|
XRPD
|
Observations
|
|
KI / iodine
|
BSCCO
|
190
|
both patterns
overlapped
|
colored surface
|
|
cyclooctane
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no change
|
no change
|
|
quinoline
|
BSCCO
|
150
|
no change
|
liquid was dark
|
|
bromine
|
BSCCO
|
200-225
|
no change
|
no change
|
|
Cl-Al-Pc
|
BSCCO
|
200
|
no ID*
|
gray
|
|
bromobenzene
|
BSCCO
I-BSCCO
|
150
150
|
no change
no ID*
|
no change
---
|
|
bromothiophene
|
BSCCO
I-BSCCO
|
150
150
|
no change
no ID*
|
no change
---
|
|
nitrobenzene
|
BSCCO
I-BSCCO
|
150
150
|
no change
no ID*
|
no change
---
|
|
perylene
|
BSCCO
|
300
|
noisy
|
white coating
|
|
AlCl3
|
BSCCO
|
300
|
no peaks
|
small dots of
orange
|
|
BF3:etherate
|
BSCCO
|
25
|
no change
|
no change
|
|
BBr3
|
BSCCO
BSCCO
|
25
100
|
no change
inconclusive
|
no change
no change
|
*XRPD pattern is different
from the starting material, but not yet identified.
Table 5.6: A second
table showing a variety of materials examined for possible intercalation.
nC4NH5 => (C4NH3)n +
2nH+ + 2ne- Eq. 5.1
Reoxidation of the material through a re-doping process may
possible restore its superconducting properties although experiments
related to this were not investigated.
A large variety of materials
were examined for possible intercalation. A summary of these trials
can be seen in Tables 5.5 and 5.6. When heating the majority of samples
in the presence of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x,
it was found that there was no effect. The samples that were first
intercalated with iodine show more sign of chemical reaction, but lack
evidence for ordered intercalation into the layered material. The
intercalation of iodine into Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x and
the intercalation of pyrrole into I-Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x show
evidence for controlled insertion of molecules into the superconductor
lattice without chemical degradation of the lattice structure.